Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

SICKNL: A Dataset for Dutch Natural Language Inference

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.05716 v1 pith:PB4MMM34 submitted 2021-01-14 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords dutchdatasetmodelssick-nlenglishinferencesickcapture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present SICK-NL (read: signal), a dataset targeting Natural Language Inference in Dutch. SICK-NL is obtained by translating the SICK dataset of Marelli et al. (2014)from English into Dutch. Having a parallel inference dataset allows us to compare both monolingual and multilingual NLP models for English and Dutch on the two tasks. In the paper, we motivate and detail the translation process, perform a baseline evaluation on both the original SICK dataset and its Dutch incarnation SICK-NL, taking inspiration from Dutch skipgram embeddings and contextualised embedding models. In addition, we encapsulate two phenomena encountered in the translation to formulate stress tests and verify how well the Dutch models capture syntactic restructurings that do not affect semantics. Our main finding is all models perform worse on SICK-NL than on SICK, indicating that the Dutch dataset is more challenging than the English original. Results on the stress tests show that models don't fully capture word order freedom in Dutch, warranting future systematic studies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HNCSE: Advancing Sentence Embeddings via Hybrid Contrastive Learning with Hard Negatives

    cs.CL 2024-11 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    HNCSE reports 2-point average STS gains over SimCSE using positive mixing and hard-negative mixing, but the method is under-specified and unverified.

Pith tools