Pith. sign in

REVIEW 9 cited by

On the use of the local prior on the absolute magnitude of Type Ia supernovae in cosmological inference

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.08641 v3 pith:GGYLTPNV submitted 2021-01-21 astro-ph.CO

On the use of the local prior on the absolute magnitude of Type Ia supernovae in cosmological inference

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords priorlocalmodelsupernovaabsoluteanalysisavoidsconstant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

A dark-energy which behaves as the cosmological constant until a sudden phantom transition at very-low redshift ($z<0.1$) seems to solve the >4$\sigma$ disagreement between the local and high-redshift determinations of the Hubble constant, while maintaining the phenomenological success of the $\Lambda$CDM model with respect to the other observables. Here, we show that such a hockey-stick dark energy cannot solve the $H_0$ crisis. The basic reason is that the supernova absolute magnitude $M_B$ that is used to derive the local $H_0$ constraint is not compatible with the $M_B$ that is necessary to fit supernova, BAO and CMB data, and this disagreement is not solved by a sudden phantom transition at very-low redshift. We make use of this example to show why it is preferable to adopt in the statistical analyses the prior on $M_B$ as an alternative to the prior on $H_0$. The three reasons are: i) one avoids potential double counting of low-redshift supernovae, ii) one avoids assuming the validity of cosmography, in particular fixing the deceleration parameter to the standard model value $q_0=-0.55$, iii) one includes in the analysis the fact that $M_B$ is constrained by local calibration, an information which would otherwise be neglected in the analysis, biasing both model selection and parameter constraints. We provide the priors on $M_B$ relative to the recent Pantheon and DES-SN3YR supernova catalogs. We also provide a Gaussian joint prior on $H_0$ and $q_0$ that generalizes the prior on $H_0$ by SH0ES.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Model-independent test of the cosmic distance duality relation with recent observational data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0

    Two model-independent methods applied to latest SN and BAO data find the cosmic distance duality relation consistent with observations within 1 sigma and no evidence of violation.

  2. Exploring the interplay of late-time dynamical dark energy and new physics before recombination

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.5

    Under standard recombination, phantom-crossing dynamical dark energy is preferred at ~97–98.5% probability; early-time fixes to the Hubble tension erase that preference while creating severe ω_m tension with CMB.

  3. KAN-LSTM-Transformer Neural Networks, MFV and Cosmological Parameters

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    KLT-Net reconstructs the SN Ia distance modulus non-parametrically; with MFV M_B and flat-ΛCDM Bayesian/Hessian inference it yields H0 ≈ 69.6 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹ and Ωm ≈ 0.30.

  4. Cosmological intercept tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Tensions in the supernova intercept a_B at z~0.01 in PantheonPlus and z~0.1 in DES-Y5 point to data systematics or inter-survey inconsistencies rather than new physics, aligning H0 measurements and reducing support fo...

  5. Exploring the interplay of late-time dynamical dark energy and new physics before recombination

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Model-independent reconstruction finds 96.7-98.5% probability of phantom crossing if recombination is standard, but early new physics to ease Hubble tension weakens this preference while requiring unrealistically high...

  6. Model-independent calibration of Gamma-Ray Bursts with neural networks

    astro-ph.CO 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Neural networks calibrate 2D and 3D Dainotti relations on the Platinum GRB sample via ANN-driven MCMC to produce a model-independent Hubble diagram with reduced scatter.

  7. The Hubble tension: A decade review

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 conditional novelty 3.0

    Pure early or late fixes to the Hubble tension are tightly constrained; remaining options are combined early-late interacting dark energy or new physics at the local-to-homogeneous transition.

  8. The Hubble tension: A decade review

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A review summarizing the Hubble tension as a persistent crisis and discussing resolutions via interacting dark energy models that combine early-time and late-time modifications.

  9. In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions

    astro-ph.CO 2021-03 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A review summarizing the Hubble constant tension and proposed solutions from new physics that restore agreement between Planck CMB data and local H0 measurements within 1-2 sigma.