Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Ehrhart-Equivalence, Equidecomposability, and Unimodular Equivalence of Integral Polytopes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.08771 v1 pith:HIQKO32M submitted 2021-01-21 math.CO

classification math.CO
keywords integralequivalencemathbbunimodularpolytopessimplicesehrhartpolynomials
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Ehrhart polynomials are extensively-studied structures that interpolate the discrete volume of the dilations of integral $n$-polytopes. The coefficients of Ehrhart polynomials, however, are still not fully understood, and it is not known when two polytopes have equivalent Ehrhart polynomials. In this paper, we establish a relationship between Ehrhart-equivalence and other forms of equivalence: the $\operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb{Z})$-equidecomposability and unimodular equivalence of two integral $n$-polytopes in $\mathbb{R}^n$. We conjecture that any two Ehrhart-equivalent integral $n$-polytopes $P,Q\subset\mathbb{R}^n$ are $\operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb{Z})$-equidecomposable into $\frac{1}{(n-1)!}$-th unimodular simplices, thereby generalizing the known cases of $n=1, 2, 3$. We also create an algorithm to check for unimodular equivalence of any two integral $n$-simplices in $\mathbb{R}^n$. We then find and prove a new one-to-one correspondence between unimodular equivalence of integral $2$-simplices and the unimodular equivalence of their $n$-dimensional pyramids. Finally, we prove the existence of integral $n$-simplices in $\mathbb{R}^n$ that are not unimodularly equivalent for all $n \ge 2$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools