Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CHOLAN: A Modular Approach for Neural Entity Linking on Wikipedia and Wikidata

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.09969 v2 pith:6LIYYO3Q submitted 2021-01-25 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords entitycholantransformerwikipediaapproachapproachesbasescontext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we propose CHOLAN, a modular approach to target end-to-end entity linking (EL) over knowledge bases. CHOLAN consists of a pipeline of two transformer-based models integrated sequentially to accomplish the EL task. The first transformer model identifies surface forms (entity mentions) in a given text. For each mention, a second transformer model is employed to classify the target entity among a predefined candidates list. The latter transformer is fed by an enriched context captured from the sentence (i.e. local context), and entity description gained from Wikipedia. Such external contexts have not been used in the state of the art EL approaches. Our empirical study was conducted on two well-known knowledge bases (i.e., Wikidata and Wikipedia). The empirical results suggest that CHOLAN outperforms state-of-the-art approaches on standard datasets such as CoNLL-AIDA, MSNBC, AQUAINT, ACE2004, and T-REx.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluation of LLMs on Long-tail Entity Linking in Historical Documents

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    GPT-3.5 and Llama-3-70B recall about 59-60% of long-tail historical entities versus ReLiK's 45.7%, but their lower precision leaves F1 scores near 53 versus ReLiK's 56.1.

Pith tools