Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Diverse Adversaries for Mitigating Bias in Training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.10001 v1 pith:PAUX5EG6 submitted 2021-01-25 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords adversarialbiastrainingdiscriminatorsdiverselearnlearningmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Adversarial learning can learn fairer and less biased models of language than standard methods. However, current adversarial techniques only partially mitigate model bias, added to which their training procedures are often unstable. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to adversarial learning based on the use of multiple diverse discriminators, whereby discriminators are encouraged to learn orthogonal hidden representations from one another. Experimental results show that our method substantially improves over standard adversarial removal methods, in terms of reducing bias and the stability of training.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FairSteer: Inference Time Debiasing for LLMs with Dynamic Activation Steering

    cs.CL 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    FairSteer uses a linear probe to detect biased activations and adds a contrastively computed steering vector to shift generation toward unbiased answers, cutting bias across six LLMs without retraining.

Pith tools