REVIEW 2 cited by
A Primal-Dual Approach to Constrained Markov Decision Processes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
In many operations management problems, we need to make decisions sequentially to minimize the cost while satisfying certain constraints. One modeling approach to study such problems is constrained Markov decision process (CMDP). When solving the CMDP to derive good operational policies, there are two key challenges: one is the prohibitively large state space and action space; the other is the hard-to-compute transition kernel. In this work, we develop a sampling-based primal-dual algorithm to solve CMDPs. Our approach alternatively applies regularized policy iteration to improve the policy and subgradient ascent to maintain the constraints. Under mild regularity conditions, we show that the algorithm converges at rate $ O(\log(T)/\sqrt{T})$, where T is the number of iterations. When the CMDP has a weakly coupled structure, our approach can substantially reduce the dimension of the problem through an embedded decomposition. We apply the algorithm to two important applications with weakly coupled structures: multi-product inventory management and multi-class queue scheduling, and show that it generates controls that outperform state-of-art heuristics.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Offline Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Trajectory Classification
TraC trains an offline safe RL policy by classifying trajectories as desirable (safe, high-reward) versus undesirable (unsafe or low-reward) using a logistic loss on a policy-ratio score.
-
Decentralized Multi-Player Q-Learning in Episodic Markov Decision Processes with Information Asymmetry
Decentralized players using pre-agreed deterministic tie-breaking can match centralized Q-learning regret when either actions or rewards are shared, but the fully asymmetric setting rests on an exploration argument th...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.