Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Rethinking Soft Labels for Knowledge Distillation: A Bias-Variance Tradeoff Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.00650 v1 pith:5DTU4KRV submitted 2021-02-01 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords labelssoftdistillationnetworkbias-varianceregularizationsamplestradeoff
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Knowledge distillation is an effective approach to leverage a well-trained network or an ensemble of them, named as the teacher, to guide the training of a student network. The outputs from the teacher network are used as soft labels for supervising the training of a new network. Recent studies \citep{muller2019does,yuan2020revisiting} revealed an intriguing property of the soft labels that making labels soft serves as a good regularization to the student network. From the perspective of statistical learning, regularization aims to reduce the variance, however how bias and variance change is not clear for training with soft labels. In this paper, we investigate the bias-variance tradeoff brought by distillation with soft labels. Specifically, we observe that during training the bias-variance tradeoff varies sample-wisely. Further, under the same distillation temperature setting, we observe that the distillation performance is negatively associated with the number of some specific samples, which are named as regularization samples since these samples lead to bias increasing and variance decreasing. Nevertheless, we empirically find that completely filtering out regularization samples also deteriorates distillation performance. Our discoveries inspired us to propose the novel weighted soft labels to help the network adaptively handle the sample-wise bias-variance tradeoff. Experiments on standard evaluation benchmarks validate the effectiveness of our method. Our code is available at \url{https://github.com/bellymonster/Weighted-Soft-Label-Distillation}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 44 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. All You Need in Knowledge Distillation Is a Tailored Coordinate System

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A teacher-free distillation method transfers dark knowledge by projecting student features into a PCA coordinate system of a self-supervised teacher and pruning irrelevant coordinates.

  2. Reward Modeling with Ordinal Feedback: Wisdom of the Crowd

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper generalizes Bradley-Terry reward modeling to ordinal feedback labels and proves that, under a marginal unbiasedness assumption, finer-grained labels reduce Rademacher complexity and can improve reward learning.

  3. PEdger++: Practical Edge Detection via Assembling Cross Information

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    PEdger++ improves fast edge detection by combining predictions from two network architectures, a momentum average over training epochs, and multiple parameter samples into soft targets and a final weighted model.

  4. The Role of Teacher Calibration in Knowledge Distillation

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Calibrating the teacher with temperature scaling before knowledge distillation gives small student accuracy gains, but the paper's causal claim that calibration error is the key driver is not cleanly established.

  5. Resource-Efficient Automatic Software Vulnerability Assessment via Knowledge Distillation and Particle Swarm Optimization

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A PSO-guided knowledge distillation framework compresses a CodeBERT vulnerability assessor to 0.6% of its original size while retaining 89.3% of its accuracy.

Pith tools