Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Nonlinear Invariant Risk Minimization: A Causal Approach

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.12353 v6 pith:BN35KFAC submitted 2021-02-24 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords datanonlinearrepresentationcausalgeneralgeneralizationinvariantapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Due to spurious correlations, machine learning systems often fail to generalize to environments whose distributions differ from the ones used at training time. Prior work addressing this, either explicitly or implicitly, attempted to find a data representation that has an invariant relationship with the target. This is done by leveraging a diverse set of training environments to reduce the effect of spurious features and build an invariant predictor. However, these methods have generalization guarantees only when both data representation and classifiers come from a linear model class. We propose invariant Causal Representation Learning (iCaRL), an approach that enables out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization in the nonlinear setting (i.e., nonlinear representations and nonlinear classifiers). It builds upon a practical and general assumption: the prior over the data representation (i.e., a set of latent variables encoding the data) given the target and the environment belongs to general exponential family distributions. Based on this, we show that it is possible to identify the data representation up to simple transformations. We also prove that all direct causes of the target can be fully discovered, which further enables us to obtain generalization guarantees in the nonlinear setting. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets show that our approach outperforms a variety of baseline methods. Finally, in the discussion, we further explore the aforementioned assumption and propose a more general hypothesis, called the Agnostic Hypothesis: there exist a set of hidden causal factors affecting both inputs and outcomes. The Agnostic Hypothesis can provide a unifying view of machine learning. More importantly, it can inspire a new direction to explore a general theory for identifying hidden causal factors, which is key to enabling the OOD generalization guarantees.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Causal Effect Identification in Heterogeneous Environments from Higher-Order Moments

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Under a single-mechanism change across two environments, the causal effect of treatment on outcome is identified up to two candidates and can be estimated from higher-order moments.

  2. Elastic Representation: Mitigating Spurious Correlations for Group Robustness

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Elastic Representation regularizes the last-layer representation with nuclear and Frobenius norms, improving worst-group accuracy on CelebA, Waterbirds, and CivilComments without needing group labels.

Pith tools