Pith. sign in

REVIEW 12 cited by

Nucleon mass radii and distribution: Holographic QCD, Lattice QCD and GlueX data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.03186 v2 pith:7RC4JFOH submitted 2021-03-04 hep-ph hep-latnucl-exnucl-th

classification hep-phhep-latnucl-exnucl-th
keywords tensorholographicdatamassa-termapproxformgluex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We briefly review and expand our recent analysis for all three invariant A,B,D gravitational form factors of the nucleon in holographic QCD. They compare well to the gluonic gravitational form factors recently measured using lattice QCD simulations. The holographic A-term is fixed by the tensor $T=2^{++}$ (graviton) Regge trajectory, and the D-term by the difference between the tensor $T=2^{++}$ (graviton) and scalar $S=0^{++}$ (dilaton) Regge trajectories. The B-term is null in the absence of a tensor coupling to a Dirac fermion in bulk. A first measurement of the tensor form factor A-term is already accessible using the current GlueX data, and therefore the tensor gluonic mass radius, pressure and shear inside the proton, thanks to holography. The holographic A-term and D-term can be expressed exactly in terms of harmonic numbers. The tensor mass radius from the holographic threshold is found to be $\langle r^2_{GT}\rangle \approx (0.57-0.60\,{\rm fm})^2$, in agreement with $\langle r^2_{GT}\rangle \approx (0.62\,{\rm fm})^2$ as extracted from the overall numerical lattice data, and empirical GlueX data. The scalar mass radius is found to be slightly larger $\langle r^2_{GS}\rangle \approx (0.7\,{\rm fm})^2$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 12 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spin resummation of heavy quarkonium photoproduction: from the gluonic gravitational form factors to the holographic pomeron

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Spin-resummed holographic QCD unifies near-threshold GFF and high-energy pomeron regimes for heavy quarkonium photoproduction and shows fixed-spin GFF extraction is not controlled.

  2. Experimental access to the gluonic origin of the proton mass

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The scalar gluonic trace form factor of the proton can be reconstructed from DVCS quark GFFs, near-threshold J/ψ gluon GFFs, and the nucleon sigma-term form factor.

  3. Momentum-projected hadron entanglement from lattice-QCD replica correlators

    hep-ph 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The vacuum-subtracted Rényi response of a momentum-projected hadron equals 1/(1-n) times the log of a replicated source-sink correlator on the cut geometry divided by the n-th power of the ordinary correlator.

  4. Proton Gravitational Structure and Mass Decomposition on the Light Front

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using a light-front Hamiltonian with three-quark and three-quark-plus-gluon Fock sectors, the authors extract quark and gluon gravitational form factors and find a proton mass decomposition of 31.5% quark energy, 34.7...

  5. Gluon Gravitational $ D$-Form Factor: The $\sigma$-Meson as a Dilaton Confronted with Lattice Data II

    hep-ph 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    σ-pole residues in gluon D-form factors for π, N, ρ and Δ are consistent with dilaton effective theory predictions within large uncertainties.

  6. Gravitational form factors of the nucleon in the Skyrme model based on scale-invariant chiral perturbation theory

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A Skyrme model with a dilaton field attributes the proton's negative internal pressure and confining force to the gluonic scale anomaly, and reproduces the lattice QCD D(t) form factor.

  7. Mechanical properties of the $\Omega^-$ baryon from gravitational form factors

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using QCD sum rules, the authors extract seven gravitational form factors of the Omega baryon and derive its internal energy, angular momentum, pressure, shear, radii, and D-terms.

  8. Mechanical properties of the nucleon from the generalized parton distributions

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using a double-distribution GPD model constrained by elastic-scattering data, the paper fits DQ(0) = -3.37 ± 0.17 from Compton form factors and derives proton pressure, shear, and radii.

  9. Bayesian Inferring Nucleon's Gravitation Form Factors via Near-threshold $J/\psi$ Photoproduction

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A Bayesian NLO analysis of near-threshold J/psi photoproduction data, combined with lattice QCD, finds compatible proton gravitational form factors and prefers negative C_q and C_g.

  10. Proton Structure from a Soft-Wall Holographic QCD Model: Mass Spectrum, Form Factors, and Mechanical Properties

    hep-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A soft-wall holographic model reproduces proton spectroscopy, form factors, radii, and J/ψ photoproduction, though the gravitational form factor D is an input-dependent ansatz.

  11. Mechanical properties of the proton from a deformed AdS holographic model

    hep-ph 2025-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A deformed AdS holographic model with a Dirac proton computes the gluon gravitational form factor A in good agreement with lattice QCD after normalizing the zero point, but the D-term and derived pressure/shear distri...

  12. The nucleon structure from an AdS/QCD model in the Veneziano limit

    nucl-th 2025-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using the VQCD holographic model, the authors compute four sets of proton observables that match experiment and lattice data, but many inputs are fitted rather than predicted.

Pith tools