REVIEW 2 cited by
SMIL: Multimodal Learning with Severely Missing Modality
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
A common assumption in multimodal learning is the completeness of training data, i.e., full modalities are available in all training examples. Although there exists research endeavor in developing novel methods to tackle the incompleteness of testing data, e.g., modalities are partially missing in testing examples, few of them can handle incomplete training modalities. The problem becomes even more challenging if considering the case of severely missing, e.g., 90% training examples may have incomplete modalities. For the first time in the literature, this paper formally studies multimodal learning with missing modality in terms of flexibility (missing modalities in training, testing, or both) and efficiency (most training data have incomplete modality). Technically, we propose a new method named SMIL that leverages Bayesian meta-learning in uniformly achieving both objectives. To validate our idea, we conduct a series of experiments on three popular benchmarks: MM-IMDb, CMU-MOSI, and avMNIST. The results prove the state-of-the-art performance of SMIL over existing methods and generative baselines including autoencoders and generative adversarial networks. Our code is available at https://github.com/mengmenm/SMIL.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Dynamic Interaction-Aware and Causality-Disentangled Framework for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis
MCAF reports state-of-the-art Acc-2/F1 on CMU-MOSI (86.52/86.51) and CMU-MOSEI (86.72/86.65), but its diffusion-denoising module is never specified in the methods.
-
VIGIL: Verifying Identity via Gated Intermittent Likelihoods for Continuous Biometric Authentication
In VIGIL, trust decays unless biometric evidence arrives, verification has an inconclusive middle zone, and repeated suspicion shrinks the window to pressure persistent attackers.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.