Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challenges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.11251 v2 pith:JOLJBKVJ submitted 2021-03-20 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords learninginterpretablemachinemodelsnetworksneuralproblemscausal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Interpretability in machine learning (ML) is crucial for high stakes decisions and troubleshooting. In this work, we provide fundamental principles for interpretable ML, and dispel common misunderstandings that dilute the importance of this crucial topic. We also identify 10 technical challenge areas in interpretable machine learning and provide history and background on each problem. Some of these problems are classically important, and some are recent problems that have arisen in the last few years. These problems are: (1) Optimizing sparse logical models such as decision trees; (2) Optimization of scoring systems; (3) Placing constraints into generalized additive models to encourage sparsity and better interpretability; (4) Modern case-based reasoning, including neural networks and matching for causal inference; (5) Complete supervised disentanglement of neural networks; (6) Complete or even partial unsupervised disentanglement of neural networks; (7) Dimensionality reduction for data visualization; (8) Machine learning models that can incorporate physics and other generative or causal constraints; (9) Characterization of the "Rashomon set" of good models; and (10) Interpretable reinforcement learning. This survey is suitable as a starting point for statisticians and computer scientists interested in working in interpretable machine learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 22 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Consistent but Miscalibrated: Evaluating LLM Limitations for Risk Communication in Natural Language

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Current LLMs produce consistent but miscalibrated natural-language descriptors of likelihood and uncertainty from probabilistic predictions and are not yet reliable zero-shot risk communicators.

  2. Attention of a Kiss: Exploring Attention Maps in Video Diffusion for XAIxArts

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A method and case study for visualizing cross-attention maps in Wan video diffusion transformers, showing token-region alignment over time and their use as artistic material.

  3. Augmented Vision-Language Models: A Systematic Review

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A structured taxonomy of inference-time augmentation techniques that connect vision-language models to external symbolic systems, tools, and knowledge sources.

Pith tools