REVIEW 2 cited by
Be Careful about Poisoned Word Embeddings: Exploring the Vulnerability of the Embedding Layers in NLP Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent studies have revealed a security threat to natural language processing (NLP) models, called the Backdoor Attack. Victim models can maintain competitive performance on clean samples while behaving abnormally on samples with a specific trigger word inserted. Previous backdoor attacking methods usually assume that attackers have a certain degree of data knowledge, either the dataset which users would use or proxy datasets for a similar task, for implementing the data poisoning procedure. However, in this paper, we find that it is possible to hack the model in a data-free way by modifying one single word embedding vector, with almost no accuracy sacrificed on clean samples. Experimental results on sentiment analysis and sentence-pair classification tasks show that our method is more efficient and stealthier. We hope this work can raise the awareness of such a critical security risk hidden in the embedding layers of NLP models. Our code is available at https://github.com/lancopku/Embedding-Poisoning.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Neutralizing Backdoors through Information Conflicts for Large Language Models
A trigger-agnostic defense that merges a backdoored LLM with a clean-data LoRA model and adds contradictory prompt evidence, reducing attack success while keeping most clean-task accuracy.
-
A Survey on Backdoor Threats in Large Language Models (LLMs): Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluations
A literature review that taxonomizes LLM backdoor attacks and defenses by model construction phase, with no new experimental results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.