REVIEW 2 cited by
Find the Gap: Black Hole Population Analysis with an Astrophysically Motivated Mass Function
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We introduce a novel black hole mass function which realistically models the physics of star formation and pair instability supernova with a minimal number of parameters. Applying this to all events in the LIGO-Virgo GWTC-2 catalog, we detect a peak at M_BHMG = 74.8^{+4.3}_{-8.0} MS, followed by a break in the mass function. Repeating the analysis without the black holes from the event GW190521, we find this feature at M_BHMG = 55.4^{+3.0}_{-6.1} MS. The latter result establishes the edge of the anticipated "black hole mass gap" at a value compatible with the expectation from standard stellar structure theory, while the former result is ~ 20MS higher, which would have far-reaching implications if confirmed. Using Bayesian techniques, we establish that our mass function fits a new catalog of black hole masses approximately as well as the pre-existing phenomenological mass functions. We also remark on the implications of these results for constraining or discovering new phenomena in nuclear and particle physics.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A new group of low-spin $50-70M_\odot$ Black Holes and the high pair-instability mass cutoff
GWTC-4.0 reveals low-spin black holes up to ~68.5 Msun, implying a higher pair-instability mass cutoff and a lower 12C(alpha,gamma)16O rate.
-
Can dark-matter Q-balls grow to the mass gap masses?
Dark-matter Q-balls in the simplest Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin model can grow to solar masses near galactic centers, but their final radii are about a solar-system wide, so they cannot explain LIGO/Virgo mass-gap events.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.