Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Image Composition Assessment with Saliency-augmented Multi-pattern Pooling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.03133 v2 pith:FETA4WTR submitted 2021-04-07 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords compositionassessmentimageaestheticdatasetlossmulti-patternmultiple
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Image composition assessment is crucial in aesthetic assessment, which aims to assess the overall composition quality of a given image. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is neither dataset nor method specifically proposed for this task. In this paper, we contribute the first composition assessment dataset CADB with composition scores for each image provided by multiple professional raters. Besides, we propose a composition assessment network SAMP-Net with a novel Saliency-Augmented Multi-pattern Pooling (SAMP) module, which analyses visual layout from the perspectives of multiple composition patterns. We also leverage composition-relevant attributes to further boost the performance, and extend Earth Mover's Distance (EMD) loss to weighted EMD loss to eliminate the content bias. The experimental results show that our SAMP-Net can perform more favorably than previous aesthetic assessment approaches.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Semantic to Structure: Learning Structural Representations for Infringement Detection

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A contrastive model fine-tuned on diffusion-generated pairs with matching depth maps and rewritten captions detects structural infringement better than DINOv2, MoCoV3, and SSCD on new SIA and SIR benchmarks.

Pith tools