Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Off-Policy Risk Assessment in Contextual Bandits

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.08977 v2 pith:FOYGTZBO submitted 2021-04-18 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords riskbanditsestimateslipschitzoff-policyrisksassessmentclass
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Even when unable to run experiments, practitioners can evaluate prospective policies, using previously logged data. However, while the bandits literature has adopted a diverse set of objectives, most research on off-policy evaluation to date focuses on the expected reward. In this paper, we introduce Lipschitz risk functionals, a broad class of objectives that subsumes conditional value-at-risk (CVaR), variance, mean-variance, many distorted risks, and CPT risks, among others. We propose Off-Policy Risk Assessment (OPRA), a framework that first estimates a target policy's CDF and then generates plugin estimates for any collection of Lipschitz risks, providing finite sample guarantees that hold simultaneously over the entire class. We instantiate OPRA with both importance sampling and doubly robust estimators. Our primary theoretical contributions are (i) the first uniform concentration inequalities for both CDF estimators in contextual bandits and (ii) error bounds on our Lipschitz risk estimates, which all converge at a rate of $O(1/\sqrt{n})$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Uncertainty Quantification and Causal Considerations for Off-Policy Decision Making

    stat.ML 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Three methods for off-policy evaluation: marginal ratio variance reduction, conformal predictive intervals, and causal bounds that falsify digital twins under unmeasured confounding.

Pith tools