Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Signatures of QGP at RHIC and the LHC

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.11406 v1 pith:QVHORWJ5 submitted 2021-04-23 nucl-ex

classification nucl-ex
keywords signaturesbeencollisionsheavy-ionrhicarticlebnl-agscern-sps
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The progress over the 30 years since the first high-energy heavy-ion collisions at the BNL-AGS and CERN-SPS has been truly remarkable. Rigorous experimental and theoretical studies have revealed a new state of the matter in heavy-ion collisions, the quark-gluon plasma (QGP). Many signatures supporting the formation of the QGP have been reported. Among them are jet quenching, the non-viscous flow, direct photons, and Debye screening effects. In this article, selected signatures of the QGP observed at RHIC and the LHC are reviewed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Topological analysis of scale-invariant spatial fluctuations in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions

    hep-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A topological ML pipeline with a particle-level density filter recovers the intermittency index of a 5% CMC signal embedded in EPOS background in (eta, phi) space.

  2. Neural network biased corrections: Cautionary study in background corrections for quenched jets

    physics.data-an 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Neural network jet background corrections trained on unquenched jets are systematically biased for quenched jets, causing simulated RAA measurements to be up to 47% too low.

Pith tools