REVIEW 3 cited by
Recovery of TESS Stellar Rotation Periods Using Deep Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We used a convolutional neural network to infer stellar rotation periods from a set of synthetic light curves simulated with realistic spot evolution patterns. We convolved these simulated light curves with real TESS light curves containing minimal intrinsic astrophysical variability to allow the network to learn TESS systematics and estimate rotation periods despite them. In addition to periods, we predict uncertainties via heteroskedastic regression to estimate the credibility of the period predictions. In the most credible half of the test data, we recover 10%-accurate periods for 46% of the targets, and 20%-accurate periods for 69% of the targets. Using our trained network, we successfully recover periods of real stars with literature rotation measurements, even past the 13.7-day limit generally encountered by TESS rotation searches using conventional period-finding techniques. Our method also demonstrates resistance to half-period aliases. We present the neural network and simulated training data, and introduce the software butterpy used to synthesize the light curves using realistic star spot evolution.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
The Maunder Model and Catalog: Stellar Rotation, Bimodal Activity, and Magnetic Braking in Kepler Main-Sequence Stars
A hybrid self-supervised and consensus-supervised model yields calibrated rotation periods for 148,746 Kepler main-sequence stars and identifies bimodal signals where the longer mode is the true rotation.
-
Companion Architectures of Sub-Saturns: Distinct Migration Pathways Across the Neptunian Landscape
Desert/ridge sub-Saturns show ~10% nearby-companion rates like hot Jupiters; savanna ones show ~70% like warm Jupiters, supporting HEM versus quiescent migration.
-
From stellar light to astrophysical insight: automating variable star research with machine learning
An invited review of machine learning for automated variable star research, covering data cleaning, variability classification, stellar parameter inference, and foundation models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.