Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Assessing Dialogue Systems with Distribution Distances

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.02573 v3 pith:JKKOUPMD submitted 2021-05-06 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords dialoguemetricssystemsconversationsdistribution-wiseevaluationexistingperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

An important aspect of developing dialogue systems is how to evaluate and compare the performance of different systems. Existing automatic evaluation metrics are based on turn-level quality evaluation and use average scores for system-level comparison. In this paper, we propose to measure the performance of a dialogue system by computing the distribution-wise distance between its generated conversations and real-world conversations. Specifically, two distribution-wise metrics, FBD and PRD, are developed and evaluated. Experiments on several dialogue corpora show that our proposed metrics correlate better with human judgments than existing metrics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Unifying Information-theoretic Perspective on Evaluating Generative Models

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new information-theoretic evaluation metric (PCE, RCE, RE) is proposed to separately detect fidelity loss, mode dropping, and mode shrinkage in generative models, and existing kNN precision/recall metrics are unifie...

Pith tools