Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

One-shot Compositional Data Generation for Low Resource Handwritten Text Recognition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.05300 v2 pith:BRBG3Z43 submitted 2021-05-11 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords datagenerationannotatedhandwrittenmethodproblemrecognitionresource
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Low resource Handwritten Text Recognition (HTR) is a hard problem due to the scarce annotated data and the very limited linguistic information (dictionaries and language models). For example, in the case of historical ciphered manuscripts, which are usually written with invented alphabets to hide the message contents. Thus, in this paper we address this problem through a data generation technique based on Bayesian Program Learning (BPL). Contrary to traditional generation approaches, which require a huge amount of annotated images, our method is able to generate human-like handwriting using only one sample of each symbol in the alphabet. After generating symbols, we create synthetic lines to train state-of-the-art HTR architectures in a segmentation free fashion. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were carried out and confirm the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Advancing Offline Handwritten Text Recognition: A Systematic Review of Data Augmentation and Generation Techniques

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A systematic review of offline handwritten text recognition augmentation and generation methods, whose claimed 55-paper corpus is contradicted by its own figures and reference list.

Pith tools