Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Boosting Light-Weight Depth Estimation Via Knowledge Distillation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.06143 v3 pith:E4U5J6ID submitted 2021-05-13 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords teacherdepthlightweightmodelnetworkstudentmethodsperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Monocular depth estimation (MDE) methods are often either too computationally expensive or not accurate enough due to the trade-off between model complexity and inference performance. In this paper, we propose a lightweight network that can accurately estimate depth maps using minimal computing resources. We achieve this by designing a compact model architecture that maximally reduces model complexity. To improve the performance of our lightweight network, we adopt knowledge distillation (KD) techniques. We consider a large network as an expert teacher that accurately estimates depth maps on the target domain. The student, which is the lightweight network, is then trained to mimic the teacher's predictions. However, this KD process can be challenging and insufficient due to the large model capacity gap between the teacher and the student. To address this, we propose to use auxiliary unlabeled data to guide KD, enabling the student to better learn from the teacher's predictions. This approach helps fill the gap between the teacher and the student, resulting in improved data-driven learning. Our extensive experiments show that our method achieves comparable performance to state-of-the-art methods while using only 1% of their parameters. Furthermore, our method outperforms previous lightweight methods regarding inference accuracy, computational efficiency, and generalizability.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools