Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Using Adversarial Attacks to Reveal the Statistical Bias in Machine Reading Comprehension Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.11136 v2 pith:VD5MDLSW submitted 2021-05-24 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelsoptionsperformancestatisticalbiasesirrelevantlanguagemethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Pre-trained language models have achieved human-level performance on many Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) tasks, but it remains unclear whether these models truly understand language or answer questions by exploiting statistical biases in datasets. Here, we demonstrate a simple yet effective method to attack MRC models and reveal the statistical biases in these models. We apply the method to the RACE dataset, for which the answer to each MRC question is selected from 4 options. It is found that several pre-trained language models, including BERT, ALBERT, and RoBERTa, show consistent preference to some options, even when these options are irrelevant to the question. When interfered by these irrelevant options, the performance of MRC models can be reduced from human-level performance to the chance-level performance. Human readers, however, are not clearly affected by these irrelevant options. Finally, we propose an augmented training method that can greatly reduce models' statistical biases.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Innocence in the Crossfire: Roles of Skip Connections in Jailbreaking Visual Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper reports higher harmful-output rates in three open-source VLMs from detailed image descriptions, in-context examples, and positive openings, and from a skip connection between internal layers, with memes riva...

  2. AutoEvoEval: An Automated Framework for Evolving Close-Ended LLM Evaluation Data

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AutoEvoEval applies 22 atomic perturbations and multi-round chains to MCQ benchmarks, causing average accuracy drops of 7.283% and up to 52.932% for long chains.

  3. Coordinated Robustness Evaluation Framework for Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A coordinated image-plus-text attack built on a surrogate multimodal encoder achieves 80-94% attack success against ViLT, BLIP, and GIT on VQA and visual reasoning, surpassing cited baselines.

Pith tools