Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

StructuralLM: Structural Pre-training for Form Understanding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.11210 v1 pith:2FIF2XGE submitted 2021-05-24 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords cellstructurallmforminformationlayoutunderstandingclassificationdocument
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large pre-trained language models achieve state-of-the-art results when fine-tuned on downstream NLP tasks. However, they almost exclusively focus on text-only representation, while neglecting cell-level layout information that is important for form image understanding. In this paper, we propose a new pre-training approach, StructuralLM, to jointly leverage cell and layout information from scanned documents. Specifically, we pre-train StructuralLM with two new designs to make the most of the interactions of cell and layout information: 1) each cell as a semantic unit; 2) classification of cell positions. The pre-trained StructuralLM achieves new state-of-the-art results in different types of downstream tasks, including form understanding (from 78.95 to 85.14), document visual question answering (from 72.59 to 83.94) and document image classification (from 94.43 to 96.08).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Survey on Question Answering over Visually Rich Documents: Methods, Challenges, and Trends

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A structured overview of question answering over visually rich documents, comparing encoding, vision-only, and multi-page methods, and highlighting comparability issues in existing benchmarks.

Pith tools