Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Optimizing Ansatz Design in QAOA for Max-cut

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.02812 v4 pith:A75IKMJQ submitted 2021-06-05 quant-ph cs.DS

classification quant-phcs.DS
keywords cnotcircuitgatesdepthmethodqaoaerrorgraph
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is studied primarily to find approximate solutions to combinatorial optimization problems. For a graph with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, a depth $p$ QAOA for the Max-cut problem requires $2\cdot m \cdot p$ CNOT gates. CNOT is one of the primary sources of error in modern quantum computers. In this paper, we propose two hardware independent methods to reduce the number of CNOT gates in the circuit. First, we present a method based on Edge Coloring of the input graph that minimizes the the number of cycles (termed as depth of the circuit), and reduces upto $\lfloor \frac{n}{2} \rfloor$ CNOT gates. Next, we depict another method based on Depth First Search (DFS) on the input graph that reduces $n-1$ CNOT gates, but increases depth of the circuit moderately. We analytically derive the condition for which the reduction in CNOT gates overshadows this increase in depth, and the error probability of the circuit is still lowered. We show that all IBM Quantum Hardware satisfy this condition. We simulate these two methods for graphs of various sparsity with the \textit{ibmq\_manhattan} noise model, and show that the DFS based method outperforms the edge coloring based method, which in turn, outperforms the traditional QAOA circuit in terms of reduction in the number of CNOT gates, and hence the probability of error of the circuit.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools