Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Multi-Label Learning from Single Positive Labels

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.09708 v2 pith:7UXU7WT7 submitted 2021-06-17 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords labelsimagemulti-labeltrainingclassificationlabelonlypositive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Predicting all applicable labels for a given image is known as multi-label classification. Compared to the standard multi-class case (where each image has only one label), it is considerably more challenging to annotate training data for multi-label classification. When the number of potential labels is large, human annotators find it difficult to mention all applicable labels for each training image. Furthermore, in some settings detection is intrinsically difficult e.g. finding small object instances in high resolution images. As a result, multi-label training data is often plagued by false negatives. We consider the hardest version of this problem, where annotators provide only one relevant label for each image. As a result, training sets will have only one positive label per image and no confirmed negatives. We explore this special case of learning from missing labels across four different multi-label image classification datasets for both linear classifiers and end-to-end fine-tuned deep networks. We extend existing multi-label losses to this setting and propose novel variants that constrain the number of expected positive labels during training. Surprisingly, we show that in some cases it is possible to approach the performance of fully labeled classifiers despite training with significantly fewer confirmed labels.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Demon is in Ambiguity: Revisiting Situation Recognition with Single Positive Multi-Label Learning

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper reformulates situation-recognition verb classification as single-positive multi-label learning and reports a 25,200-image multi-label benchmark with a graph and adversarial training method that improves MAP ...

Pith tools