REVIEW 3 cited by
Modelling the chemical evolution of the Milky Way
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this review I will discuss the comparison between model results and observational data for the Milky Way, the predictive power of such models as well as their limits. Such a comparison, known as Galactic archaeology, allows us to impose constraints on stellar nucleosynthesis and timescales of formation of the various Galactic components (halo, bulge, thick disk and thin disk).
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Probing the origins. III. Exoplanet demographics across Galactic birth radii
Giant-planet hosts preferentially formed in the metal-rich inner Galaxy and later migrated, while rocky-only systems are less centrally concentrated and show smaller radial excursions.
-
Is the composition of the Solar atmosphere unusual, and if so, why? Possible interpretations
A review of the 10-20% solar volatile-to-refractory excess relative to solar twins, weighing galactic, protoplanetary, and planetary-ingestion explanations and finding no decisive answer.
-
Chemical Evolution of Galaxies: Past, Present and Future
A single-author review of galactic chemical-evolution modeling, centered on the time-delay interpretation of [X/Fe] vs [Fe/H] as a tool for galactic archaeology.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.