REVIEW 2 cited by
Attention Bottlenecks for Multimodal Fusion
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Humans perceive the world by concurrently processing and fusing high-dimensional inputs from multiple modalities such as vision and audio. Machine perception models, in stark contrast, are typically modality-specific and optimised for unimodal benchmarks, and hence late-stage fusion of final representations or predictions from each modality (`late-fusion') is still a dominant paradigm for multimodal video classification. Instead, we introduce a novel transformer based architecture that uses `fusion bottlenecks' for modality fusion at multiple layers. Compared to traditional pairwise self-attention, our model forces information between different modalities to pass through a small number of bottleneck latents, requiring the model to collate and condense the most relevant information in each modality and only share what is necessary. We find that such a strategy improves fusion performance, at the same time reducing computational cost. We conduct thorough ablation studies, and achieve state-of-the-art results on multiple audio-visual classification benchmarks including Audioset, Epic-Kitchens and VGGSound. All code and models will be released.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Kepler-Encoder-v0.1: Towards a Multimodal Embedding Model for Robots
A self-supervised multimodal encoder trained with vision, proprioception, and force yields a vision-only latent that recovers end-effector state and force above vision baselines on RH20T, with modest absolute force accuracy.
-
Finding Change in Satellite Archives from Text: How to Combine Before-and-After Images Efficiently
A training-free subtraction-then-attention cascade matches or beats full fusion recall on LEVIR-CC at 10–15× lower query cost; Mamba is no faster than attention at L=196; TBF cuts parameters 2.3× for a 0.007 BLEU-1 cost.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.