Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Effect of Systematic Uncertainty Estimation on the Muon $g-2$ Anomaly

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.02652 v1 pith:XEMUTCUD submitted 2021-07-06 hep-ph physics.data-an

classification hep-phphysics.data-an
keywords uncertaintyuncertaintiesassignedmuonpredictionsignificancestandardsystematic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

The statistical significance that characterizes a discrepancy between a measurement and theoretical prediction is usually calculated assuming that the statistical and systematic uncertainties are known. Many types of systematic uncertainties are, however, estimated on the basis of approximate procedures and thus the values of the assigned errors are themselves uncertain. Here the impact of the uncertainty {\it on the assigned uncertainty} is investigated in the context of the muon $g-2$ anomaly. The significance of the observed discrepancy between the Standard Model prediction of the muon's anomalous magnetic moment and measured values are shown to decrease substantially if the relative uncertainty in the uncertainty assigned to the Standard Model prediction exceeds around 30\%. The reduction in sensitivity increases for higher significance, so that establishing a $5\sigma$ effect will require not only small uncertainties but the uncertainties themselves must be estimated accurately to correspond to one standard deviation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Implementing Errors on Errors: Bayesian vs Frequentist

    hep-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    D'Agostini's Bayesian gamma prior and Cowan's frequentist gamma variance model are the same gamma law under the parameter map k = lambda = (n-1)/2 = 1/(4 epsilon^2).

Pith tools