Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

MedGPT: Medical Concept Prediction from Clinical Narratives

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.03134 v1 pith:ET5HXZG2 submitted 2021-07-07 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords datamedicalehrseventsfuturemedgptpatientavailable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The data available in Electronic Health Records (EHRs) provides the opportunity to transform care, and the best way to provide better care for one patient is through learning from the data available on all other patients. Temporal modelling of a patient's medical history, which takes into account the sequence of past events, can be used to predict future events such as a diagnosis of a new disorder or complication of a previous or existing disorder. While most prediction approaches use mostly the structured data in EHRs or a subset of single-domain predictions and outcomes, we present MedGPT a novel transformer-based pipeline that uses Named Entity Recognition and Linking tools (i.e. MedCAT) to structure and organize the free text portion of EHRs and anticipate a range of future medical events (initially disorders). Since a large portion of EHR data is in text form, such an approach benefits from a granular and detailed view of a patient while introducing modest additional noise. MedGPT effectively deals with the noise and the added granularity, and achieves a precision of 0.344, 0.552 and 0.640 (vs LSTM 0.329, 0.538 and 0.633) when predicting the top 1, 3 and 5 candidate future disorders on real world hospital data from King's College Hospital, London, UK (\textasciitilde600k patients). We also show that our model captures medical knowledge by testing it on an experimental medical multiple choice question answering task, and by examining the attentional focus of the model using gradient-based saliency methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Correcting Visual Blur Induced by Attention Distraction to Reduce Hallucinations: Algorithm and Theory

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.5 of 10

    Object hallucinations in MLLMs track multi-head spatial inconsistency and temporal visual-attention fade; AFIP corrects both via cross-head enrichment and gated historical reinjection, reducing CHAIR/POPE rates training-free.

  2. LLM4EHR: Aligning Clinical Time Series with Medical Event Sequences via Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A pre-training method that aligns ICU time-series windows with LLM-encoded event summaries via a regularised InfoNCE loss improves downstream predictions and cross-dataset transfer.

  3. FoMoH: A clinically meaningful foundation model evaluation for structured electronic health records

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    FoMoH benchmarks six structured EHR foundation models on 14 tasks and finds they do not consistently outperform supervised baselines, particularly for rare diseases and low-data regimes.

Pith tools