REVIEW 1 cited by
Memes in the Wild: Assessing the Generalizability of the Hateful Memes Challenge Dataset
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Hateful memes pose a unique challenge for current machine learning systems because their message is derived from both text- and visual-modalities. To this effect, Facebook released the Hateful Memes Challenge, a dataset of memes with pre-extracted text captions, but it is unclear whether these synthetic examples generalize to `memes in the wild'. In this paper, we collect hateful and non-hateful memes from Pinterest to evaluate out-of-sample performance on models pre-trained on the Facebook dataset. We find that memes in the wild differ in two key aspects: 1) Captions must be extracted via OCR, injecting noise and diminishing performance of multimodal models, and 2) Memes are more diverse than `traditional memes', including screenshots of conversations or text on a plain background. This paper thus serves as a reality check for the current benchmark of hateful meme detection and its applicability for detecting real world hate.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Representation Decomposition for Learning Similarity and Contrastness Across Modalities for Affective Computing
A method that decomposes CLIP image and text features into a shared low-rank component and modality-specific sparse components, then uses an attention-weighted soft prompt to guide an LLM for sentiment, emotion, and h...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.