REVIEW 2 cited by
Federated Mixture of Experts
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Federated learning (FL) has emerged as the predominant approach for collaborative training of neural network models across multiple users, without the need to gather the data at a central location. One of the important challenges in this setting is data heterogeneity, i.e. different users have different data characteristics. For this reason, training and using a single global model might be suboptimal when considering the performance of each of the individual user's data. In this work, we tackle this problem via Federated Mixture of Experts, FedMix, a framework that allows us to train an ensemble of specialized models. FedMix adaptively selects and trains a user-specific selection of the ensemble members. We show that users with similar data characteristics select the same members and therefore share statistical strength while mitigating the effect of non-i.i.d data. Empirically, we show through an extensive experimental evaluation that FedMix improves performance compared to using a single global model across a variety of different sources of non-i.i.d.-ness.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
FedWeave: Rethinking the Unit of Specialization in Heterogeneous Federated MoE-LoRA
Splitting federated LoRA experts by data pattern while training one router on full client data improves heterogeneous multi-task LLM fine-tuning over client-level expert baselines.
-
Efficient Training of Large-Scale AI Models Through Federated Mixture-of-Experts: A System-Level Approach
A position paper proposing a conceptual client-expert alignment and load-balancing system for federated MoE, without experimental validation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.