REVIEW 2 cited by
Multi-Label Image Classification with Contrastive Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recently, as an effective way of learning latent representations, contrastive learning has been increasingly popular and successful in various domains. The success of constrastive learning in single-label classifications motivates us to leverage this learning framework to enhance distinctiveness for better performance in multi-label image classification. In this paper, we show that a direct application of contrastive learning can hardly improve in multi-label cases. Accordingly, we propose a novel framework for multi-label classification with contrastive learning in a fully supervised setting, which learns multiple representations of an image under the context of different labels. This facilities a simple yet intuitive adaption of contrastive learning into our model to boost its performance in multi-label image classification. Extensive experiments on two benchmark datasets show that the proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art performance in the comparison with the advanced methods in multi-label classification.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Enhancing Text-Based Hierarchical Multilabel Classification for Mobile Applications via Contrastive Learning
HMCL, a level-wise negative-sampling contrastive pretraining scheme, improves HMCN's hierarchical multilabel classification for mobile apps and achieved a reported 10.70% KS improvement in a downstream credit-risk task.
-
Multi-level Supervised Contrastive Learning
Multiple projection heads, each trained with SupCon on a different label or hierarchy level, improve accuracy in hierarchical and multi-label classification, especially with few training samples.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.