Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Energy Storage Peak Shaving Feasibility: Case Studies in Upstate New York

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.14146 v1 pith:SFNIB5EX submitted 2021-07-29 math.OC

classification math.OC
keywords energyyorkmunicipalstorageutilitybatterybesscost-effective
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents the results of a benefit-cost analysis involving the application of battery energy storage systems (BESS) for three of New York State's municipal electric departments (MEDs). New York's municipal electric utilities generally have allocations to receive hydroelectric energy from the New York Power Authority (NYPA). When the NYPA firm hydro allocation is exceeded, the utility must procure energy from other sources, generally at significantly higher prices. Additionally, the municipal utility pays to transmit the energy from the generation source to the utility gateway. There are multiple ways that these MED's can use energy storage technology to reduce their costs. This paper develops benefit and cost analyses, and concludes that BESS technology is cost-effective in some cases, and will become more cost-effective in the future as battery prices decrease.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools