Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Population-informed priors in gravitational-wave astronomy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.02462 v2 pith:LS4MSF55 submitted 2021-08-05 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

classification gr-qcastro-ph.HE
keywords eventsgravitational-wavepopulation-informedbayesiandistributionsformalismindividualnaturally
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We describe a Bayesian formalism for analyzing individual gravitational-wave events in light of the rest of an observed population. This analysis reveals how the idea of a "population-informed prior" arises naturally from a suitable marginalization of an underlying hierarchical Bayesian model which consistently accounts for selection effects. Our formalism naturally leads to the presence of "leave-one-out" distributions which include subsets of events. This differs from other approximations, also known as empirical Bayes methods, which effectively double count one or more events. We design a double-reweighting post-processing strategy that uses only existing data products to reconstruct the resulting population-informed posterior distributions. Although the correction we highlight is an important conceptual point, we find it has a limited impact on the current catalog of gravitational-wave events. Our approach further allows us to study, for the first time in the gravitational-wave literature, correlations between the parameters of individual events and those of the population.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The diffraction-lensing interpretation of GW231123 with astrophysical priors

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GW231123 is better fit by a lower-mass merger diffracted by an isolated ~1000 M_sun lens, but astrophysical priors and a frequentist rate estimate make this lensing interpretation unlikely.

  2. Gravitational-wave astronomy requires population-informed parameter estimation

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Single-event GW parameter estimates under reference priors are population-biased; hierarchical, population-informed re-analysis is needed and changes the identification of the most extreme black holes in the catalog.

  3. Exceptionality of exceptional gravitational-wave events

    astro-ph.HE 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    When measurement uncertainties are comparable to the width of the source population, exceptional-looking gravitational-wave events are often noise-inflated: GW241110's anti-aligned spin is likely much weaker than clai...

Pith tools