Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

How May I Help You? Using Neural Text Simplification to Improve Downstream NLP Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.04604 v2 pith:63WGLNR3 submitted 2021-09-10 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords textneurallanguagelattermachinesnaturalsimplificationtasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The general goal of text simplification (TS) is to reduce text complexity for human consumption. This paper investigates another potential use of neural TS: assisting machines performing natural language processing (NLP) tasks. We evaluate the use of neural TS in two ways: simplifying input texts at prediction time and augmenting data to provide machines with additional information during training. We demonstrate that the latter scenario provides positive effects on machine performance on two separate datasets. In particular, the latter use of TS improves the performances of LSTM (1.82-1.98%) and SpanBERT (0.7-1.3%) extractors on TACRED, a complex, large-scale, real-world relation extraction task. Further, the same setting yields improvements of up to 0.65% matched and 0.62% mismatched accuracies for a BERT text classifier on MNLI, a practical natural language inference dataset.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. QueryBandits for Hallucination Mitigation: Exploiting Semantic Features for No-Regret Rewriting

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A contextual bandit that chooses among five query-rewrite strategies, conditioned on 17 linguistic features, reduces LLM hallucination on QA benchmarks and beats static prompting and no-rewrite baselines.

  2. Can summarization approximate simplification? A gold standard comparison

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Paragraph-by-paragraph BRIO summarization reaches ROUGE-L 0.654 against Newsela level-1 human simplifications, outperforming whole-document summarization but still far from human-level simplification.

Pith tools