REVIEW 1 cited by
Looking for Confirmations: An Effective and Human-Like Visual Dialogue Strategy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Generating goal-oriented questions in Visual Dialogue tasks is a challenging and long-standing problem. State-Of-The-Art systems are shown to generate questions that, although grammatically correct, often lack an effective strategy and sound unnatural to humans. Inspired by the cognitive literature on information search and cross-situational word learning, we design Confirm-it, a model based on a beam search re-ranking algorithm that guides an effective goal-oriented strategy by asking questions that confirm the model's conjecture about the referent. We take the GuessWhat?! game as a case-study. We show that dialogues generated by Confirm-it are more natural and effective than beam search decoding without re-ranking.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Divide-and-Conquer: Tree-structured Strategy with Answer Distribution Estimator for Goal-Oriented Visual Dialogue
A binary-search style reward that halves candidate objects each round improves goal-oriented visual dialogue accuracy and reduces question repetition.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.