Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Causal Loss: Driving Correlation to Imply Causation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.12066 v1 pith:VTD5GYIN submitted 2021-10-22 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords losscausalalgorithmsinterventionalalthoughassociativeassumedbeen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Most algorithms in classical and contemporary machine learning focus on correlation-based dependence between features to drive performance. Although success has been observed in many relevant problems, these algorithms fail when the underlying causality is inconsistent with the assumed relations. We propose a novel model-agnostic loss function called Causal Loss that improves the interventional quality of the prediction using an intervened neural-causal regularizer. In support of our theoretical results, our experimental illustration shows how causal loss bestows a non-causal associative model (like a standard neural net or decision tree) with interventional capabilities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools