Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Positivity and renormalization of parton densities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.01170 v2 pith:ILZFH57W submitted 2021-11-01 hep-ph hep-exnucl-th

classification hep-phhep-exnucl-th
keywords positivitydensitiesderivationmethodspartonboundscalculationsother
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

There have been recent debates about whether $\overline{\text{MS}}$ parton densities exactly obey positivity bounds (including the Soffer bound), and whether the bounds should be applied as a constraint on global fits to parton densities and on nonperturbative calculations. A recent paper (JHEP ${\bf \text{11}}$ (2020) 129) appears to provide a proof of positivity in contradiction with earlier work by other authors. We examine their derivation and find that its primary failure is in the apparently uncontroversial statement that bare pdfs are always positive. We show that under the conditions used in the derivation, that statement fails. We provide some elementary calculations in a model QFT that show how this situation can generically arise in reality. In addition, we observe that the methods used in the derivation are in common with much, but not all, other work where factorization is derived. Our examination pinpoints considerable difficulties with these methods that render them either wrong or highly problematic. The issue of positivity highlights that these methods can lead to wrong results of phenomenological importance. From our analysis we identify the restricted situations in which positivity can be violated.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. What are the consequences of independent factorization and renormalization scales?

    hep-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Independent factorization and renormalization scales are inconsistent with simultaneously preserving RG invariance, Ward identities, and PDF sum rules in generalized pole subtraction schemes.

  2. Parton Distribution Functions and their Generalizations

    hep-ph 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A textbook-style introduction to the definitions, QCD properties, experimental access, and current phenomenological status of PDFs and their generalizations.

Pith tools