Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

EEGEyeNet: a Simultaneous Electroencephalography and Eye-tracking Dataset and Benchmark for Eye Movement Prediction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.05100 v2 pith:SBE2PNIC submitted 2021-11-06 eess.SP cs.CVcs.LG

classification eess.SPcs.CVcs.LG
keywords benchmarkdatasetconsistsdifferenteegeyenetelectroencephalographyevaluateeye-tracking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a new dataset and benchmark with the goal of advancing research in the intersection of brain activities and eye movements. Our dataset, EEGEyeNet, consists of simultaneous Electroencephalography (EEG) and Eye-tracking (ET) recordings from 356 different subjects collected from three different experimental paradigms. Using this dataset, we also propose a benchmark to evaluate gaze prediction from EEG measurements. The benchmark consists of three tasks with an increasing level of difficulty: left-right, angle-amplitude and absolute position. We run extensive experiments on this benchmark in order to provide solid baselines, both based on classical machine learning models and on large neural networks. We release our complete code and data and provide a simple and easy-to-use interface to evaluate new methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. QSVM-QNN: Quantum Support Vector Machine Based Quantum Neural Network Learning Algorithm for Brain-Computer Interfacing Systems

    quant-ph 2025-05 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A hybrid QSVM-QNN quantum classifier is tested on two EEG datasets, but its reported accuracies are not superior to classical baselines in the paper's own tables.

Pith tools