Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Comparative Study on Transfer Learning and Distance Metrics in Semantic Clustering over the COVID-19 Tweets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.08658 v1 pith:EUMQFBY3 submitted 2021-11-16 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords methodsdistanceclusteringembeddingmetricstermstestscombinations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper is a comparison study in the context of Topic Detection on COVID-19 data. There are various approaches for Topic Detection, among which the Clustering approach is selected in this paper. Clustering requires distance and calculating distance needs embedding. The aim of this research is to simultaneously study the three factors of embedding methods, distance metrics and clustering methods and their interaction. A dataset including one-month tweets collected with COVID-19-related hashtags is used for this study. Five methods, from earlier to new methods, are selected among the embedding methods: Word2Vec, fastText, GloVe, BERT and T5. Five clustering methods are investigated in this paper that are: k-means, DBSCAN, OPTICS, spectral and Jarvis-Patrick. Euclidian distance and Cosine distance as the most important distance metrics in this field are also examined. First, more than 7,500 tests are performed to tune the parameters. Then, all the different combinations of embedding methods with distance metrics and clustering methods are investigated by silhouette metric. The number of these combinations is 50 cases. First, the results of these 50 tests are examined. Then, the rank of each method is taken into account in all the tests of that method. Finally, the major variables of the research (embedding methods, distance metrics and clustering methods) are studied separately. Averaging is performed over the control variables to neutralize their effect. The experimental results show that T5 strongly outperforms other embedding methods in terms of silhouette metric. In terms of distance metrics, cosine distance is weakly better. DBSCAN is also superior to other methods in terms of clustering methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Interpretable Company Similarity with Sparse Autoencoders

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Sparse autoencoder features from Llama 3.1's internal representation of company descriptions yield clusters whose members' stock returns move together more than clusters from SIC codes, BISC, or standard embeddings.

Pith tools