Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Flares in gamma-ray burst X-ray afterglows as prompt emission from slightly misaligned structured jets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.02917 v2 pith:R6L2SHJW submitted 2021-12-06 astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords flaresmodelgamma-raypromptburstcoreemissionmisaligned
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We develop a model to explain the flaring activity in gamma-ray burst X-ray afterglows within the framework of slightly misaligned observers to structured jets. We suggest that flares could be the manifestation of prompt dissipation within the core of the jet, appearing to a misaligned observer in the X-ray band because of less favorable Doppler boosting. These flares appear during the afterglow phase because of core--observer light travel delays. In this picture, the prompt emission recorded by this observer comes from material along their line of sight, in the lateral structure of the jet, outside the jet's core. We start by laying down the basic analytical framework to determine the flares characteristics as a function of those of the gamma-ray pulse an aligned observer would see. We show that there is viable parameter space to explain flares with typical observing times and luminosities. We then analytically explore this model, showing that it naturally produces flares with small aspect ratios, as observed. We perform fits of our model to two $Swift$/XRT flares representing two different types of morphology, to show that our model can capture both. The ejection time of the core jet material responsible of the flare is a critical parameter. While it always remains small compared to the observed time of the flare, confirming that our model does not require very late central engine activity, late ejection times are strongly favored, sometimes larger than the observed duration of the parent gamma-ray burst's prompt emission as measured by $T_{90}$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A review of long lasting activities of the central engine of gamma-ray bursts

    astro-ph.HE 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A review of ultra-long gamma-ray bursts and X-ray plateau phases as evidence that the central engine keeps working long after the first flash.

Pith tools