REVIEW 2 cited by
Quantum Interior Point Methods for Semidefinite Optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We present two quantum interior point methods for semidefinite optimization problems, building on recent advances in quantum linear system algorithms. The first scheme, more similar to a classical solution algorithm, computes an inexact search direction and is not guaranteed to explore only feasible points; the second scheme uses a nullspace representation of the Newton linear system to ensure feasibility even with inexact search directions. The second is a novel scheme that might seem impractical in the classical world, but it is well-suited for a hybrid quantum-classical setting. We show that both schemes converge to an optimal solution of the semidefinite optimization problem under standard assumptions. By comparing the theoretical performance of classical and quantum interior point methods with respect to various input parameters, we show that our second scheme obtains a speedup over classical algorithms in terms of the dimension of the problem $n$, but has worse dependence on other numerical parameters.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A distillation-teleportation protocol for fault-tolerant QRAM
An adaptive distillation-teleportation protocol implements a fault-tolerant QRAM query with poly(n) quantum resources and 1/poly(n) device fidelity, at the cost of an exponential classical dataset update each round.
-
Quantum Algorithms for Bandits with Knapsacks with Improved Regret and Time Complexities
Quantum algorithms for bandits with knapsacks achieve improved regret and time complexity by replacing classical sampling with quantum Monte Carlo and approximate quantum LP solving.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.