REVIEW 11 cited by
GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Experts
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Scaling language models with more data, compute and parameters has driven significant progress in natural language processing. For example, thanks to scaling, GPT-3 was able to achieve strong results on in-context learning tasks. However, training these large dense models requires significant amounts of computing resources. In this paper, we propose and develop a family of language models named GLaM (Generalist Language Model), which uses a sparsely activated mixture-of-experts architecture to scale the model capacity while also incurring substantially less training cost compared to dense variants. The largest GLaM has 1.2 trillion parameters, which is approximately 7x larger than GPT-3. It consumes only 1/3 of the energy used to train GPT-3 and requires half of the computation flops for inference, while still achieving better overall zero-shot and one-shot performance across 29 NLP tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 11 Pith papers
-
The Ray Tracing Sampler: Bayesian Sampling of Neural Networks for Everyone
A new ray-tracing MCMC sampler keeps ray speed constant, making it far more robust to stochastic gradients and able to sample billion-parameter neural networks on one GPU.
-
Breaking the MoE LLM Trilemma: Dynamic Expert Clustering with Structured Compression
Dynamic expert clustering plus shared-base, low-rank residual compression and two-stage routing cuts MoE parameter count by about 80% with a modest quality cost on GLUE and WikiText-103.
-
Kinetics: Rethinking Test-Time Scaling Laws
A memory-aware test-time scaling law shows small models are overestimated and sparse attention is needed for efficient scaling.
-
Safe and Certifiable AI Systems: Concepts, Challenges, and Lessons Learned
The paper presents the TÜV AUSTRIA Trusted AI audit catalog, a statistical framework based on the Stochastic Application Domain Definition, minimum performance requirements, and independent-sample testing for certifyi...
-
Apple Intelligence Foundation Language Models: Tech Report 2025
Apple's 3B on-device and larger server language models match or beat several similarly sized open models on MMLU, MMMLU, and MGSM, using new efficiency techniques like KV-cache sharing and 2-bit quantization.
-
AbbIE: Autoregressive Block-Based Iterative Encoder for Efficient Sequence Modeling
An iterative Transformer that reuses its middle layers with an extra residual connection matches a standard Transformer after one pass and improves perplexity and zero-shot accuracy when run for more passes at test time.
-
Scaling Fine-Grained MoE Beyond 50B Parameters: Empirical Evaluation and Practical Insights
At 56B total parameters, fine-grained MoE with smaller, more numerous experts beats standard Switch and Mixtral-style MoE on validation loss and average downstream accuracy at matched FLOPs.
-
Rethinking Data Mixture for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey and New Perspectives
A survey organizing LLM data mixture methods into offline and online families, with a fine-grained taxonomy based on optimization frameworks.
-
Memory for Large Language Models
The paper organizes LLM memory architectures along three axes—implicit vs explicit representation, offline vs online update, and short vs long-term persistence—plus finer-grained update rules.
-
A Vision Toward Energy-Efficient Domain-Specific Artificial Intelligence Models and Agents
A position paper proposing compact, domain-specific AI agents as the path to ≥1000× energy efficiency, without demonstrating the claim.
-
The Carbon Cost of Conversation, Sustainability in the Age of Language Models
A review-style essay that claims LLM training and use are environmentally expensive, but the quantitative evidence it presents is unreliable and internally inconsistent.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.