Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Rethinking Importance Weighting for Transfer Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.10157 v1 pith:GNERKXYE submitted 2021-12-19 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords learningassumptiontransfercausaldistributionhoweverimportanceimportance-weighting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A key assumption in supervised learning is that training and test data follow the same probability distribution. However, this fundamental assumption is not always satisfied in practice, e.g., due to changing environments, sample selection bias, privacy concerns, or high labeling costs. Transfer learning (TL) relaxes this assumption and allows us to learn under distribution shift. Classical TL methods typically rely on importance-weighting -- a predictor is trained based on the training losses weighted according to the importance (i.e., the test-over-training density ratio). However, as real-world machine learning tasks are becoming increasingly complex, high-dimensional, and dynamical, novel approaches are explored to cope with such challenges recently. In this article, after introducing the foundation of TL based on importance-weighting, we review recent advances based on joint and dynamic importance-predictor estimation. Furthermore, we introduce a method of causal mechanism transfer that incorporates causal structure in TL. Finally, we discuss future perspectives of TL research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Uncertainty Quantification and Causal Considerations for Off-Policy Decision Making

    stat.ML 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Three methods for off-policy evaluation: marginal ratio variance reduction, conformal predictive intervals, and causal bounds that falsify digital twins under unmeasured confounding.

Pith tools