REVIEW 1 cited by
Toward Educator-focused Automated Scoring Systems for Reading and Writing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper presents methods for improving automated essay scoring with techniques that address the computational trade-offs of self-attention and document length. To make Automated Essay Scoring (AES) more useful to practitioners, researchers must overcome the challenges of data and label availability, authentic and extended writing, domain scoring, prompt and source variety, and transfer learning. This paper addresses these challenges using neural network models by employing techniques that preserve essay length as an important feature without increasing model training costs. It introduces techniques for minimizing classification loss on ordinal labels using multi-objective learning, capturing semantic information across the entire essay using sentence embeddings to use transformer architecture across arbitrarily long documents, the use of such models for transfer learning, automated hyperparameter generation based on prompt-corpus metadata, and, most importantly, the use of semantic information to provide meaningful insights into student reading through analysis of passage-dependent writing resulting in state-of-the-art results for various essay tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
"All that Glitters": Approaches to Evaluations with Unreliable Model and Human Annotations
Encoder models trained on noisy classroom ratings look super-human under standard concordance metrics, but generalizability, disattenuation, and hierarchical rater analyses show the apparent advantage is partly spurio...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.