REVIEW 2 cited by
Comparison and Analysis of Image-to-Image Generative Adversarial Networks: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have recently introduced effective methods of performing Image-to-Image translations. These models can be applied and generalized to a variety of domains in Image-to-Image translation without changing any parameters. In this paper, we survey and analyze eight Image-to-Image Generative Adversarial Networks: Pix2Pix, CycleGAN, CoGAN, StarGAN, MUNIT, StarGAN2, DA-GAN, and Self Attention GAN. Each of these models presented state-of-the-art results and introduced new techniques to build Image-to-Image GANs. In addition to a survey of the models, we also survey the 18 datasets they were trained on and the 9 metrics they were evaluated on. Finally, we present results of a controlled experiment for 6 of these models on a common set of metrics and datasets. The results were mixed and showed that, on certain datasets, tasks, and metrics, some models outperformed others. The last section of this paper discusses those results and establishes areas of future research. As researchers continue to innovate new Image-to-Image GANs, it is important to gain a good understanding of the existing methods, datasets, and metrics. This paper provides a comprehensive overview and discussion to help build this foundation.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Testing chatbots on the creation of encoders for audio conditioned image generation
All chatbot-designed audio encoders failed to align with CLIP text embeddings and produced incoherent images, while showing a surprising architectural similarity across chatbots.
-
Effectively obtaining acoustic, visual and textual data from videos
A video-processing pipeline created a 2.24 million-sample audio-image-text dataset, with text captions generated by BLIP from video frames.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.