Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Survey on RGB-D Datasets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.05761 v2 pith:776BQY6G submitted 2022-01-15 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords datasetsdepthdatargb-dapplicationscomputercontainingdifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

RGB-D data is essential for solving many problems in computer vision. Hundreds of public RGB-D datasets containing various scenes, such as indoor, outdoor, aerial, driving, and medical, have been proposed. These datasets are useful for different applications and are fundamental for addressing classic computer vision tasks, such as monocular depth estimation. This paper reviewed and categorized image datasets that include depth information. We gathered 203 datasets that contain accessible data and grouped them into three categories: scene/objects, body, and medical. We also provided an overview of the different types of sensors, depth applications, and we examined trends and future directions of the usage and creation of datasets containing depth data, and how they can be applied to investigate the development of generalizable machine learning models in the monocular depth estimation field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Enhancing Monocular Depth Estimation with Multi-Source Auxiliary Tasks

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Training a frozen DINOv2 backbone with a shared decoder on auxiliary multi-label dense classification improves monocular depth accuracy by about 11 percent on in-domain benchmarks.

Pith tools