REVIEW 1 cited by
Robust Vector Quantized-Variational Autoencoder
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Image generative models can learn the distributions of the training data and consequently generate examples by sampling from these distributions. However, when the training dataset is corrupted with outliers, generative models will likely produce examples that are also similar to the outliers. In fact, a small portion of outliers may induce state-of-the-art generative models, such as Vector Quantized-Variational AutoEncoder (VQ-VAE), to learn a significant mode from the outliers. To mitigate this problem, we propose a robust generative model based on VQ-VAE, which we name Robust VQ-VAE (RVQ-VAE). In order to achieve robustness, RVQ-VAE uses two separate codebooks for the inliers and outliers. To ensure the codebooks embed the correct components, we iteratively update the sets of inliers and outliers during each training epoch. To ensure that the encoded data points are matched to the correct codebooks, we quantize using a weighted Euclidean distance, whose weights are determined by directional variances of the codebooks. Both codebooks, together with the encoder and decoder, are trained jointly according to the reconstruction loss and the quantization loss. We experimentally demonstrate that RVQ-VAE is able to generate examples from inliers even if a large portion of the training data points are corrupted.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
PhysiInter: Integrating Physical Mapping for High-Fidelity Human Interaction Generation
A text-to-motion pipeline that projects motions through physics-based imitation for training and post-processing, plus new consistency and marker-interaction losses.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.