Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Are Big Recommendation Models Fair to Cold Users?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.13607 v1 pith:ZI2TUZIQ submitted 2022-02-28 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords userscoldmodelsperformancerecommendationuserbehaviorsheavy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Big models are widely used by online recommender systems to boost recommendation performance. They are usually learned on historical user behavior data to infer user interest and predict future user behaviors (e.g., clicks). In fact, the behaviors of heavy users with more historical behaviors can usually provide richer clues than cold users in interest modeling and future behavior prediction. Big models may favor heavy users by learning more from their behavior patterns and bring unfairness to cold users. In this paper, we study whether big recommendation models are fair to cold users. We empirically demonstrate that optimizing the overall performance of big recommendation models may lead to unfairness to cold users in terms of performance degradation. To solve this problem, we propose a BigFair method based on self-distillation, which uses the model predictions on original user data as a teacher to regularize predictions on augmented data with randomly dropped user behaviors, which can encourage the model to fairly capture interest distributions of heavy and cold users. Experiments on two datasets show that BigFair can effectively improve the performance fairness of big recommendation models on cold users without harming the performance on heavy users.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Revisiting Language Models in Neural News Recommender Systems

    cs.IR 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Larger language models as news encoders do not consistently improve recommendation accuracy, but they do improve performance for cold-start users, at higher fine-tuning and compute cost.

Pith tools