Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

COPA: Certifying Robust Policies for Offline Reinforcement Learning against Poisoning Attacks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.08398 v1 pith:TAVALW2E submitted 2022-03-16 cs.LG cs.CR

classification cs.LGcs.CR
keywords certificationattacksdifferentpoisoningrobustnessaggregationcopapropose
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As reinforcement learning (RL) has achieved near human-level performance in a variety of tasks, its robustness has raised great attention. While a vast body of research has explored test-time (evasion) attacks in RL and corresponding defenses, its robustness against training-time (poisoning) attacks remains largely unanswered. In this work, we focus on certifying the robustness of offline RL in the presence of poisoning attacks, where a subset of training trajectories could be arbitrarily manipulated. We propose the first certification framework, COPA, to certify the number of poisoning trajectories that can be tolerated regarding different certification criteria. Given the complex structure of RL, we propose two certification criteria: per-state action stability and cumulative reward bound. To further improve the certification, we propose new partition and aggregation protocols to train robust policies. We further prove that some of the proposed certification methods are theoretically tight and some are NP-Complete problems. We leverage COPA to certify three RL environments trained with different algorithms and conclude: (1) The proposed robust aggregation protocols such as temporal aggregation can significantly improve the certifications; (2) Our certification for both per-state action stability and cumulative reward bound are efficient and tight; (3) The certification for different training algorithms and environments are different, implying their intrinsic robustness properties. All experimental results are available at https://copa-leaderboard.github.io.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ADG: Ambient Diffusion-Guided Dataset Recovery for Corruption-Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ADG uses an ambient DDPM to flag corrupted RL transitions, trains a standard DDPM only on the clean subset, then refines the flagged transitions to produce a recovered dataset that improves offline RL policies.

  2. Multi-level Certified Defense Against Poisoning Attacks in Offline Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A DP-based certified defense provides lower bounds on expected cumulative reward and per-state action stability for offline RL under transition- and trajectory-level poisoning, with larger certified radii than COPA.

  3. Position: Certified Robustness Does Not (Yet) Imply Model Security

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A certified robustness radius says nothing about whether a sample is clean or correctly predicted, so certification does not yet imply model security.

Pith tools