Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Common Coil Dipole for High Field Magnet Design and R&D

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.08750 v1 pith:GPEVL7VG submitted 2022-03-16 physics.acc-ph

Ramesh Gupta , Kathleen Amm , Julien Avronsart , Michael Anerella , Anis Ben Yahia , John Cozzolino , Piyush Joshi , Mithlesh Kumar
show 17 more authors
Febin Kurian Chris Runyan William Sampson Jesse Schmalzle Stephan Kahn Ronald Scanlan Robert Weggel Erich Willen Qingjin Xu Javier Munilla Fernando Toral Paolo Ferracin Steve Gourlay GianLuca Sabbi Xiaorong Wang Danko van der Laan Jeremy Weiss
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.acc-ph
keywords designcoilcommonmagnetconductorhighlessprogram
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The common coil geometry provides an alternate design to the conventional cosine theta dipoles. It allows a wider range of conductor and magnet technologies. It also facilitates a low-cost, rapid-turn-around design and R&D program. Recent studies carried out as a part of the US Magnet Development Program revealed that at high fields (20 T with 15% operating margin or more), the common coil design also uses significantly less conductor (particularly much less HTS), as compared to that in the other designs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools